Innovative Strategy for Selecting Industries for Program-Target Stimulation of Regional Economic Diversification

Alan K. Karaev, Oksana S. Gorlova, Vadim V. Ponkratov, Margarita L. Vasyunina, Andrey I. Masterov, Marina L. Sedova, Elena V. Mikhina

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to substantiate the approach to the selection of industries for program-target stimulation of regional economy diversification, focusing on developing new strong industries and increasing the economic complexity of the regional economy. The research methodology is based on the application of the concept of revealed comparative advantages and an assessment of the economic complexity of industries and regions of Russia (the Udmurt Republic, Republic of Mordovia, Kaliningrad Region, and Trans-Baikal Territory) using data on tax revenues by economic sectors. The novelty of this research lies in demonstrating the effectiveness of applying the revealed comparative advantage concept, an approach to assessing economic complexity based on the use of tax revenue data by economic sectors, and a strategy for modernizing intermediate opportunities when selecting industries for program-target stimulation of regional economy diversification. The practical significance of the results is determined by the possibilities of their use in the application of program-target mechanisms to solve problems of stimulating the development of individual sectors of the regional economy. Selecting priority areas for diversification based on economic complexity methods can contribute to the improvement of budget balancing, economic growth and sustainable development, and mitigation of interregional inequality.

 

Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2023-04-03-013

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Innovation; Budget of a Federal Subject; Tax Revenues by Economic Sectors; Balassa Indicator of Revealed Comparative Advantage; Economic Complexity; Economic Diversification.

References


Rigby, D. L., Roesler, C., Kogler, D., Boschma, R., & Balland, P. A. (2022). Do EU regions benefit from Smart Specialisation principles? Regional Studies, 56(12), 2058–2073. doi:10.1080/00343404.2022.2032628.

Hidalgo, C. A., Winger, B., Barabási, A. L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487. doi:10.1126/science.1144581.

Saviotti, P. P., & Frenken, K. (2008). Export variety and the economic performance of countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(2), 201–218. doi:10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5.

Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10570–10575. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900943106.

Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. In The Atlas of Economic Complexity. The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001.

Cristelli, M., Tacchella, A., & Pietronero, L. (2015). The heterogeneous dynamics of economic complexity. PLoS ONE, 10(2), 117174. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117174.

Hartmann, D., Jara-Figueroa, C., Guevara, M., Simoes, A., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). The structural constraints of income inequality in Latin America. Integration & Trade Journal, 40, 70–85. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1701.03770.

Hartmann, D., Guevara, M. R., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristarán, M., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions, and Income Inequality. World Development, 93, 75–93. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020.

Hidalgo, C., & Hartmann, D. (2017). Economic Complexity, Institutions and Income Inequality. Debate the Issues: Complexity and Policy Making, OECD Publishing, 1-3. doi:10.1787/9789264271531-en.

Gala, P., Camargo, J., & Freitas, E. (2018). The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) was right: Scale-free complex networks and core-periphery patterns in world trade. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(3), 633–651. doi:10.1093/cje/bex057.

Gala, P., Camargo, J., Magacho, G., & Rocha, I. (2018). Sophisticated jobs matter for economic complexity: An empirical analysis based on input-output matrices and employment data. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 45, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2017.11.005.

Pinheiro, F. L., Alshamsi, A., Hartmann, D., Boschma, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2018). Shooting High or Low: Do Countries Benefit from Entering Unrelated Activities? doi:10.48550/arXiv.1801.05352.

Blokhin A.A., & Likhachev A.A. (2022). The impact of institutional factors on economic dynamics in the regions. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15, 60–73. doi:10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.4.

Hartmann, D. (2014) Economic Complexity and Human Development: How Economic Diversification and Social Networks Affect Human Agency and Welfare. Routledge, United Kingdom. doi:10.4324/9780203722084.

Blokhin, A. A., Golovan’, M. V., & Gridin, R. V. (2023). The Contribution of Large, Medium and Small Companies to Industry Dynamics. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 34(1), 51–58. doi:10.1134/S1075700723010033.

Hidalgo, C. A., Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Delgado, M., Feldman, M., Frenken, K., Glaeser, E., He, C., Kogler, D. F., Morrison, A., Neffke, F., Rigby, D., Stern, S., Zheng, S., & Zhu, S. (2018). The Principle of Relatedness. Springer Proceedings in Complexity, 0, 451–457. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_46.

Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Harvard University, Cambridge, United States. Available online: https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/industrial-policy-twenty-first-century.pdf (accessed on May 2023).

Anureev, S. V. Comparative analysis of budget-tax relations in the oil industry of the USA, Canada, Great Britain and Russia. ECO Journal, 5, 140–161.

Solyannikova, S. P. (2021). Appropriate Budgetary Policy for a Changing Economy. The World of New Economy, 15(2), 6–15. doi:10.26794/2220-6469-2021-15-2-6-15.

Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603–633. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X.

Afanasiev, M. (2022). New guidelines for choosing priority areas of economic diversification based on a system of situational centers. Economics and the Mathematical Methods, 58(4), 29. doi:10.31857/s042473880023017-7.

Ali, S. S., & Kaur, R. (2021). Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in implementation of social sustainability in warehousing of developing countries: A hybrid approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129154. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129154.

Rivera, B., Leon, M., Cornejo, G., & Florez, H. (2023). Analysis of the Effect of Human Capital, Institutionality and Globalization on Economic Complexity: Comparison between Latin America and Countries with Greater Economic Diversification. Economies, 11(8), 204. doi:10.3390/economies11080204.

Hidalgo, C. A. (2023). The policy implications of economic complexity. Research Policy, 52(9), 104863. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104863.

Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2011). What You Export Matters. SSRN Electronic Journal, KSG Working Paper No. RWP05-063. doi:10.2139/ssrn.896243.

Afanasyev, M. Y., & Kudrov, A. V. (2020). Estimates of economic complexity in the structure of the regional economy. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(4), 43–53. doi:10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-4.4.

Hartmann, D., Zagato, L., Gala, P., & Pinheiro, F. L. (2021). Why did some countries catch-up, while others got stuck in the middle? Stages of productive sophistication and smart industrial policies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 58, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2021.04.007.

Stojkoski, V., Koch, P., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2023). Multidimensional economic complexity and inclusive green growth. Communications Earth and Environment, 4(1), 130. doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00770-0.

Kudrov, A. V., & Afanasiev, M. Y. (2021). Forecast of new strong sectors in the region’s economy. In Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Econometrics and Simulation of Real Processes, 69–73. doi:10.33276/978-5-8211-0797-8-69-73.

Grebennikov, V. (2019). Budgetary Self-Sufficiency as a Problem of the Governmental Programming of Regional Development. Economics and the Mathematical Methods, 55(4), 68. doi:10.31857/s042473880006774-0.

Grebennikov, V. (2021). Intergovernmental relations as a problem of program budgeting. Economics and the Mathematical Methods, 57(4), 40. doi:10.31857/s042473880017515-5.

Abdrassilov, A., Orynbassarova, Y., & Tvaronaviciene, M. (2023). Exploring Environmental Factors for the Sports Clusters Development. Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism, 14(3), 799-810. doi:10.14505/jemt.v14.3(67).19.

Karaev, A. K., Gorlova, O. S., Ponkratov, V. V., Vasyunina, M. L., Masterov, A. I., & Sedova, M. L. (2023). Program-Target Mechanisms to Ensure the Fiscal Balance of the Federal Constituent. Emerging Science Journal, 7(5), 1517–1533. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-05-05.

Hartmann, D., Bezerra, M., & Pinheiro, F. L. (2019). Identifying Smart Strategies for Economic Diversification and Inclusive Growth in Developing Economies. The Case of Paraguay. In SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-40. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3346790.

Sen, A. (1999). The possibility of social choice. American Economic Review, 89(3), 349–378. doi:10.1257/aer.89.3.349.

Bjorn, J., Edquist, C., Lundvall, B. (2003). Economic Development and the National System of Innovation Approach. In Proceedings of the Innovation Systems and Development Strategies for the Third Millenium, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2–6 November 2003.

Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K. J., & Chaminade, C. (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.

Ranis, G., Stewart, F., & Ramirez, A. (2000). Economic growth and human development. World Development, 28(2), 197–219. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00131-X.

Amsden, A. H. (2010). Say’s Law, Poverty Persistence, and Employment Neglect. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 11(1), 57–66. doi:10.1080/19452820903481434.

Hartmann, D., & Buchmann, T. (2016). The comparative technological advantages and international patent network of Turkey and Germany. In International Innovation Networks and Knowledge Migration: The German-Turkish Nexus, Routledge, 225–245. doi:10.4324/9781315691077.

Pyka, A., Kuştepeli, Y., & Hartmann, D. (2016). International innovation networks and knowledge migration: The German-Turkish nexus. In International Innovation Networks and Knowledge Migration: The German-Turkish Nexus, Routledge, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.4324/9781315691077.

Bahar, D., & Rapoport, H. (2021). Migration, Knowledge Diffusion and the Comparative Advantage of Nations. SSRN Electronic Journal, IZA Discussion Paper No. 9788, 1-67. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2750271.

Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.

Afanasyev, M., & Kudrov, A.V. (2021). Economic complexity and embedding of regional economies’ structures. Economics and the Mathematical Methods, 57(3), 67. doi:10.31857/s042473880016410-0.

Afanasyev, M.Yu., & Gusev, A.A. (2022). Approximation of estimates of economic complexity when choosing priority areas for diversification. Digital Economy, 1, 52–59.

Federal Tax Service of Russia (2023). Tax revenue data. Form 1NOM 010122. Accrual and receipt of taxes, fees and insurance contributions to the budget system of the Russian Federation for the main types of economic activity, Russia. Available online: https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn77/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/forms/8826515/ (accessed on May 2023).

Lyubimov, I. L., Gvozdeva, M. A., Kazakova, M. V., & Nesterova, K. V. (2017). Economic complexity of Russian regions and their potential to diversify. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2(34), 94–122. doi:10.31737/2221-2264-2017-34-2-4.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/HIJ-2023-04-03-013

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Alan K. Karaev, Oksana S. Gorlova, Vadim V. Ponkratov, Margarita L. Vasyunina, Andrey I. Masterov, Marina L. Sedova, Elena V. Mikhina